- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 15:22:19 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
(Part 1 goes through ISSUE-16. More to follow as I find time.) I wanted to review our open issues and propose to close many of them. Please take a look at these and let us know if you disagree with any of the resolutions. Perhaps we'll try to make group decisions on these one week from Tuesday. PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-5, ISSUE-6, ISSUE-7, and ISSUE-13 with no change, noting that SPARQL 1.1 will only allow SELECT subqueries within the query pattern. PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED clauses are not permitted in subqueries. PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE. Lee ~~Not Ready To Close Yet~~ ISSUE-1 -- will resolve once we settle on how to publish federated query down the road ISSUE-15 -- I think we have consensus here around custom aggregate snamed with URIs, with no keywords, allowing the DISTINCT modifier, and allowing the parameterized syntax introduced for GROUP_CONCAT, but I'm not positve and don't see this spelled out yet in the editor's draft, so didn't want to propose to resolve the issue yet. ISSUE-16 -- aggregates & mixed data types -- don't remember what the latest here is
Received on Sunday, 16 May 2010 19:22:55 UTC