- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:12:14 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- CC: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 4/19/2010 4:46 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 18/04/2010 8:04 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: >> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: >> >>> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Steve Harris wrote: >>> >>>> That makes sense to me - what's the range of sd:extensionFunction? >>> >>> Right now it's sd:Function which had covered both scalar functions >>> and aggregates. By making a new sd:extensionAggregate, we could then >>> have the respective ranges be appropriately specific. >> >> Also, once this is done there's no need for both sd:Function and >> sd:ScalarFunction. Unless someone objects I'll remove >> sd:ScalarFunction and just use sd:Function. > > +1 : good idea. Yes, this all makes sense to me. Lee > > Andy > >> >> .greg > >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 15:12:56 UTC