Re: issue round-up, part 1

On 5/17/2010 6:11 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-5, ISSUE-6, ISSUE-7, and ISSUE-13 with no change,
>> noting that SPARQL 1.1 will only allow SELECT subqueries within the
>> query pattern.
> Agree to close on the understanding that "ASK queries in FILTERs" are
> covered by EXIST/NOT EXISTS in FILTERs.

Right, this was my intention/understanding as well.

>> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the
>> same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED
>> clauses are not permitted in subqueries.
> Agreed with the understanding that active graph of the outer query is is
> the initial active graph of the subquery.

I'm (personally) fine with this -- let's discuss it briefly before 
resolving tomorrow.

>> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the
>> following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and
> Agreed.



> Andy

Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 00:49:50 UTC