- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:09:10 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1/ URIs for built-in functions
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-04-06#URIs_for_built__2d_in_SPARQL_functions
if a team person is available for sorting out the root name. And what
RDF we might put at the URI for each function.
2/ Federated query:
Syntax - agreed on BINDING are the end of the query?
I'd like to get the grammar ready soon so everyone can inspect.
BINDING and Update and federated query
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service#update
protocol changes?
should bindings be more like a parameterised query than a join of a
table of constants?
Andy
On 11/04/2010 9:17 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I haven't seen much activity on the mailing list.
>
> Please let me know if there are topics that you would like to discuss on
> Tuesday.
>
> In lieu of any activity, I think we'll ask for updates from the editors
> and adjourn early.
>
> As a reminder: we are targeting having all of our documents in a
> reviewable state so that we can publish them a couple of weeks into May.
>
> Lee
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 18:09:53 UTC