Re: comment on update

Hi Axel,

I get the impression that Ross is well aware of what we've been doing.
I believe that he is offering his calculus as a contribution to the
SPARQL Update effort since we have not had the opportunity to develop
one for ourselves.

Regards,
Paul Gearon

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0009.html and added it to the comments...
> not sure what to think of it. The mail doesn't really indicate any suggestions.
>
> I would be inclined to answer something short along the following lines. Agreed?
>
> ==========================
> Dear Ross,
>
> Thanks for the input. You can check the current working draft of the SPARQL/Update specification
> that the group is working on, which is an evolution of the SPARQL/Update proposal you cite in your paper [4], at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/
>
> Comments on this document are highly welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Axel, on behalf of the WG
> ==========================
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 2 April 2010 16:43:10 UTC