- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:05:23 -0400
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 4/28/2010 1:42 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Paul Gearon wrote: > >> I know that a mandatory "WHERE" is inconsistent with SPARQL Query, but >> I've personally never seen a query in the wild without the WHERE >> keyword (I've seen them in examples in this forum, but nowhere else). >> Given the confusion above, plus the fact that we're already a little >> inconsistent with SPARQL Query (e.g. USING instead of FROM), then I >> think it's reasonable to require the word. > > I know people who use the WHERE-less form of SELECT a lot, but I agree that it should be required in updated based on Steve's example. I always use the WHERE-less form myself, but I'm happy to have it be required in DELETE & INSERT. Lee
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:06:07 UTC