- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:42:34 -0400
- To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Paul Gearon wrote: > I know that a mandatory "WHERE" is inconsistent with SPARQL Query, but > I've personally never seen a query in the wild without the WHERE > keyword (I've seen them in examples in this forum, but nowhere else). > Given the confusion above, plus the fact that we're already a little > inconsistent with SPARQL Query (e.g. USING instead of FROM), then I > think it's reasonable to require the word. I know people who use the WHERE-less form of SELECT a lot, but I agree that it should be required in updated based on Steve's example. .greg
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:43:04 UTC