- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:22:41 +0100
- To: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 7 Jun 2010, at 14:14, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 07/06/2010 1:06 PM, Axel Polleres wrote: > > I was asking whether IRI(string) should - like xsd:integer - be allowed as a partial mapping for strings representing IRIs, ie. just the same way as for literals representing IRIs. Is that already covered somehow? > > Seems to be the only point you are making is whether the section > "Constructor Functions" is changed to include IRI or whether it should > be renamed. Not really the only one, I also wanted to ask why/whether IRI does/doesn't apply to xsd:string typed literals? > > I confess I for one would rather not create confusion from > > "http://example/"^^xsd:anyURI vs <http://example/> hmmm, do you think that moving IRI together with the casts would create this confusion? Axel > > Andy >
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 13:29:33 UTC