Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction

On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Steve Harris wrote:

> On 2010-04-18, at 19:38, Gregory Williams wrote:
>> Does anyone have thoughts on how that should be aligned with a renaming of sd:AggregateFunction to indicate that it's not really a function? Maybe we add a new property sd:extensionAggregate that is a subproperty of sd:feature?
> 
> That makes sense to me - what's the range of sd:extensionFunction?

Right now it's sd:Function which had covered both scalar functions and aggregates. By making a new sd:extensionAggregate, we could then have the respective ranges be appropriately specific.

.greg

Received on Sunday, 18 April 2010 18:58:40 UTC