- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:58:11 -0400
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Steve Harris wrote: > On 2010-04-18, at 19:38, Gregory Williams wrote: >> Does anyone have thoughts on how that should be aligned with a renaming of sd:AggregateFunction to indicate that it's not really a function? Maybe we add a new property sd:extensionAggregate that is a subproperty of sd:feature? > > That makes sense to me - what's the range of sd:extensionFunction? Right now it's sd:Function which had covered both scalar functions and aggregates. By making a new sd:extensionAggregate, we could then have the respective ranges be appropriately specific. .greg
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2010 18:58:40 UTC