- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:01:48 +0100
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 15/05/2010 8:31 AM, Gregory Williams wrote: > "Networked RDF knowledge" - I find the use of "knowledge" to be confusing for an information resource (perhaps just a personal preference, but I'd think knowledge would be more likely to be a non-info resource, all else being equal). Use of "IRI" and "URI" in this definition and the previous one don't seem consistent (almost being used interchangably). +1 There is the "data", "information", "knowledge" hierarchy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIKW#Data.2C_Information.2C_Knowledge Andy
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 10:10:14 UTC