Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction

On 18/04/2010 8:04 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
>
>> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
>>
>>> That makes sense to me - what's the range of sd:extensionFunction?
>>
>> Right now it's sd:Function which had covered both scalar functions and aggregates. By making a new sd:extensionAggregate, we could then have the respective ranges be appropriately specific.
>
> Also, once this is done there's no need for both sd:Function and sd:ScalarFunction. Unless someone objects I'll remove sd:ScalarFunction and just use sd:Function.

+1 : good idea.

 Andy

>
> .greg

Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 08:52:28 UTC