- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:46:46 +0100
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 18/04/2010 8:04 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > >> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Steve Harris wrote: >> >>> That makes sense to me - what's the range of sd:extensionFunction? >> >> Right now it's sd:Function which had covered both scalar functions and aggregates. By making a new sd:extensionAggregate, we could then have the respective ranges be appropriately specific. > > Also, once this is done there's no need for both sd:Function and sd:ScalarFunction. Unless someone objects I'll remove sd:ScalarFunction and just use sd:Function. +1 : good idea. Andy > > .greg
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 08:52:28 UTC