Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.

> http://www.w3.org/ns/rif#imports

I am not sure whether that flies... IMO there is a certain expectation from users 
on namespace prefixes being used consistently, see e.g. http://prefix.cc/rif

So, I am a bit unhappy if we hijack the rif: prefix for a new namespace URI.
Sorry about being picky here, 

Axel


On 21 May 2010, at 15:52, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:

> Okay, I've reverted back to this import URI, added an editorial note for the
> URI of entailment regime, added clarifying sentences in the editorial note
> regarding safety, and added additional references.  I've also updated
> 'Finite Answer Set Conditions (Informative)' with additional information
> regarding safety as well.
> 
> -- Chime
> 
> On 5/21/10 10:05 AM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/rif#imports
> 
> 
> ===================================
> 
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
> in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009). 
> Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
> a complete listing of our services, staff and
> locations.
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
>

Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 11:07:54 UTC