public-owl-wg@w3.org from December 2007 by date

Monday, 31 December 2007

• Re: document preparation for publication Bijan Parsia
• RE: document preparation for publication Boris Motik
• document preparation for publication Sandro Hawke

Sunday, 30 December 2007

• Next meeting 2nd January 2008 Ian Horrocks

Monday, 24 December 2007

• New Issues Ian Horrocks
• Re: Punning object and data properties Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Punning object and data properties Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 21 December 2007

• RE: imports and absolute URIs Boris Motik
• Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Ontology versions Jim Hendler
• Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL XML syntax? Bijan Parsia
• OWL XML syntax? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Ontology versions Jeremy Carroll
• imports and absolute URIs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-55 (was Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 19th, 2007) Ian Horrocks
• RE: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) Boris Motik
• ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation): Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility) OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Ontology versions Rinke Hoekstra

Thursday, 20 December 2007

• Re: Ontology versions Jim Hendler
• Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Jeremy Carroll
• imports Jeremy Carroll
• implementations and specs Jeremy Carroll
• Ontology versions Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: minutes on wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• UFDTF: Who our documentation should target Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 19 December 2007

• Re: proposal for cancelling 2 Jan OWL WG telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Next meeting date: 2nd or 9th of January? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• minutes on wiki Sandro Hawke
• proposal for cancelling 2 Jan OWL WG telecon ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 19th, 2007 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Next meeting date: 2nd or 9th of January? Ivan Herman
• example of change in satisfiability because of rdfs:Class to owl:Class repair Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class): owl:class vs rdfs:class Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 19th, 2007 Jim Hendler
• Minutes cleanup of last week Sandro Hawke
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 19th, 2007 Ian Horrocks
• RE: ISSUE-49 (structural IRIs): REPORTED: structural specification should use IRIs, not strings Boris Motik
• Minutes cleanup of last week Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Efficiency/scalability Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Other fragments? Re: Major changes in Fragments Document Rinke Hoekstra
• Efficiency/scalability Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 18 December 2007

• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 19th, 2007 Evan Wallace
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 19th, 2007 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Major changes in Fragments Document Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• F2F2 3-4 April 2008, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA Ian Horrocks
• Re: PROPOSAL to reject ISSUE-25 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Facts in DL-Lite [was Re: Major changes in Fragments Document] Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• Facts in DL-Lite [was Re: Major changes in Fragments Document] Michael Smith
• Re: Major changes in Fragments Document Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: DLP deleted [Re: Major changes in Fragments Document] Rinke Hoekstra
• DLP deleted [Re: Major changes in Fragments Document] Michael Smith
• Major changes in Fragments Document Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler

Monday, 17 December 2007

• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Bijan Parsia
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Bijan Parsia
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
• Re: DL Lite Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• DL Lite Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Declarations in OWL 1.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• DL lookup table Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: [Today's] UFDTF meeting canceled Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Tomorrow's UFDTF meeting canceled Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Pat Hayes
• Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 16 December 2007

• RE: Declarations in OWL 1.1 Boris Motik
• Re: Declarations in OWL 1.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 15 December 2007

• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 Alan Ruttenberg
• Typing and declarations -- a summary Boris Motik
• Declarations in OWL 1.1 Boris Motik
• Problems with typed vocabulary and rdf:type triples Boris Motik
• A proposal for imports in OWL 1.1 Boris Motik
• Re: PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-13 (quotation): REPORTED: functional syntax - quotation in strings and literals Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 14 December 2007

• [UFDTF] Pointers to existing UFD's Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Alan Ruttenberg

Thursday, 13 December 2007

• Re: PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Jim Hendler
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68 Jim Hendler
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 Jim Hendler
• Re: PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Carsten Lutz
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Michael Smith
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Uli Sattler
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Uli Sattler
• Re: PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Alan Ruttenberg
• Minutes of the telephone conference on 12/12/2007 Boris Motik
• possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• PROPOSAL to reject ISSUE-25 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• accept ISSUE-12: annotation of multi-triple properties Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Jim Hendler
• PROPOSAL to *close* (not postpone) ISSUE-83 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• PRPOSAL to close ISSUE-8 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 12 December 2007

• Re: Wiki-page on EL++ and ISSUE-79 Bernardo Cuenca Grau
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 12th, 2007 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Wiki-page on EL++ and ISSUE-79 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Wiki-page on EL++ and ISSUE-79 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 12th, 2007 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-13 (quotation): REPORTED: functional syntax - quotation in strings and literals Boris Motik
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Pascal Hitzler
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-85 (optional): Behaviour of "Optional"/MIN 0 restrictions and retrieval of fillers of existential restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Wiki-page on EL++ and ISSUE-79 Carsten Lutz
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Evan Wallace
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 12th, 2007 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Ivan Herman
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: racer documentation Carsten Lutz
• Re: rationals or reals? Carsten Lutz
• Re: minutes from f2f1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 11 December 2007

• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday December 12th, 2007 Ian Horrocks

Monday, 10 December 2007

• Re: linking tracker to public-owl-dev? Ian Horrocks
• UFDTF: ACTION-23 clarify attribution issues Jeremy Carroll
• On OWL Lite Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Jim Hendler
• skolemization proposal Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Jim Hendler
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Carsten Lutz
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: racer documentation Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Jim Hendler
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Evren Sirin
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Jim Hendler
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Jim Hendler
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Carsten Lutz
• skolems: visible differences? Jeremy Carroll
• linking tracker to public-owl-dev? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Carsten Lutz
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Ivan Herman

Sunday, 9 December 2007

• Re: QCR problem in OWL 1.1 Full - action ?? from F2F Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 8 December 2007

• Re: A stab at operationalizing Evan Wallace's suggestion for a new Overview Jim Hendler
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Jim Hendler
• Re: A stab at operationalizing Evan Wallace's suggestion for a new Overview Bijan Parsia
• Re: A stab at operationalizing Evan Wallace's suggestion for a new Overview Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Fragments - specific proposal Carsten Lutz
• Re: A stab at operationalizing Evan Wallace's suggestion for a new Overview Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: QCR problem in OWL 1.1 Full - action ?? from F2F Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 7 December 2007

• Fragments - specific proposal Jim Hendler
• minutes from f2f1 Sandro Hawke
• ISSUE-31 (XSD defined datatypes) Battle, Steven
• RE: A stab at operationalizing Evan Wallace's suggestion for a new Overview Conrad Bock
• OWLED, Washington, DC, April 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A stab at operationalizing Evan Wallace's suggestion for a new Overview Rinke Hoekstra
• A stab at operationalizing Evan Wallace's suggestion for a new Overview Deborah L. McGuinness
• slides on dl and full Jeremy Carroll
• Fwd: Slides for Bernardo's talk Ian Horrocks
• QCR problem in OWL 1.1 Full - action ?? from F2F Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Slides for Zhe's talk Pascal Hitzler
• Re: Slides for Zhe's talk Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Slides for Zhe's talk Ian Horrocks
• rationals or reals? Pascal Hitzler
• Re: racer documentation Carsten Lutz
• racer documentation Jeremy Carroll
• Slides for Uli Sattler's datatypes talk Ian Horrocks

Thursday, 6 December 2007

• Re: ISSUE-88 (md5): Ontology header request, optional md5 checksum of ontology Alan Ruttenberg
• Fwd: rdfs:Class vs owl:Class Jim Hendler
• FW: Invitation to Present and coordinate with OWL WG Task Force on User Facing Documents Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-88 (md5): Ontology header request, optional md5 checksum of ontology Jim Hendler
• FW: Invitation to Present and coordinate with OWL WG Task Force on User Facing Documents Kashyap, Vipul
• ISSUE-89 (rdf:type mapping): REPORTED: In the RDF mapping (*,rdf:type,owl:Class) triples do not map to axioms OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Rich annotation examples Ian Horrocks
• User Facing Documents Task Force session intro slides Evan Wallace
• Peter's presentation Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Jim Hendler
• ISSUE-88 (md5): Ontology header request, optional md5 checksum of ontology OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-87 (rational numbers): RAISED: Adding a datatype to represent rational numbers OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Boris's presentation Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-77 (Horn-SHIQ): Extending Horn-SHIQ Markus Krötzsch

Wednesday, 5 December 2007

• Re: ISSUE-76 (DLP): REPORTED: DLP Markus Krötzsch

Thursday, 6 December 2007

• Want to become of OWL Working Group bisu@drtc.isibang.ac.in
• ISSUE-86 (anonymous properties): RDF/XML serialization for anonymous inverse properties OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-85 (optional): Behaviour of "Optional"/MIN 0 restrictions and retrieval of fillers of existential restrictions OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Fwd: News from Tracker Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 5 December 2007

• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Deborah L. McGuinness
• Update on status of SCD from XML Schema group Michael Smith
• Re: Extending OWL DL vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-73 (infinite universe): REPORTED: Should owl:Thing be necessarily infinite? Alan Rector
• OWL 1.1 Issue: Behaviour of "Optional"/MIN 0 restrictions and retrieval of fillers of existential restrictions Alan Rector
• RDF/XML serialization for anonymous inverse properties Evren Sirin
• Punning object and data properties Evren Sirin
• Introduction: Evren Sirin Evren Sirin

Tuesday, 4 December 2007

• RE: Extending OWL DL vocabulary Conrad Bock
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Jim Hendler
• Re: SOTD for publications Ian Horrocks
• Re: SOTD for publications Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Jim Hendler
• Re: SOTD for publications Ian Horrocks
• UFDTF - non-record of non-telecon Jeremy Carroll
• SOTD for publications Jeremy Carroll
• FYI: translations of old docs Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: Rich Annotations Vojtech Svatek
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Ian Horrocks

Monday, 3 December 2007

• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Uli Sattler
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 (really ISSUE-64)? Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 (really ISSUE-64)? Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Conrad Bock
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Jim Hendler
• Re: Links to implementation lists Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Jim Hendler
• Links to implementation lists Sandro Hawke
• Links to implementation lists Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Uli Sattler
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-32 complex annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (and ISSUE-56 repairsomerdf) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 (really ISSUE-64)? Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-32 complex annotations Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 (really ISSUE-64)? Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 (really ISSUE-64)? Bijan Parsia

Sunday, 2 December 2007

• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 (really ISSUE-64)? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (and ISSUE-56 repairsomerdf) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Ian Horrocks
• Re: proposal - Fragments redux (unifying the threads under Issues 75-80) Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: issues being discussed: REPORTED vs ACCEPTED Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-76 (DLP): REPORTED: DLP Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-75 (Non tractable fragments): REPORTED: Tractable fragments that are not tractable Ian Horrocks
• Issues and annotations Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-49 (structural IRIs): REPORTED: structural specification should use IRIs, not strings Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 1 December 2007

• Re: Minutes 28/11/2007 Jeff Z. Pan
• "Join" conditions on property chains Kashyap, Vipul
• [public-owl-wg] <none> Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-32 complex annotations Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-49 (structural IRIs): REPORTED: structural specification should use IRIs, not strings Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-47 (compound keys): REPORTED: 6.2-Compound Keys Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-43 (range restrictions): REPORTED: 5.7 Range restrictions should not be separate URIs Ian Horrocks
• ISSUE-32 complex annotations Ian Horrocks
• Re: Extending OWL DL vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Extending OWL DL vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Last message date: Monday, 31 December 2007 12:03:50 UTC