On 21 Dec 2007, at 16:17, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Is there [going to be] an XML syntax corresponding to the > functional syntax? I hope so. I was planning to raise it as an issue soon as the core documents are out. > Will it be normative? I hope so. There are a number of situations where RDF/XML is not XML tool friendly enough for easy adoption (in particular, for web services it really helps to be XML schema "friendly"). > Jeremy > > (Honest question .... I'm wondering about hanging the axiom > annotations off bits of such a syntax rather than off reifications) Intriguing...say more? Cheers, Bijan.Received on Friday, 21 December 2007 16:25:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:41 UTC