Re: OWL XML syntax?

On 21 Dec 2007, at 16:17, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Is there [going to be] an XML syntax corresponding to the  
> functional syntax?

I hope so. I was planning to raise it as an issue soon as the core  
documents are out.

> Will it be normative?

I hope so. There are a number of situations where RDF/XML is not XML  
tool friendly enough for easy adoption (in particular, for web  
services it really helps to be XML schema "friendly").

> Jeremy
>
> (Honest question .... I'm wondering about hanging the axiom  
> annotations off bits of such a syntax rather than off reifications)

Intriguing...say more?

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Friday, 21 December 2007 16:25:43 UTC