- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:32:42 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk, hendler@cs.rpi.edu, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > In any case, there should probably be some explanation of why the issue > is not being considered, and "no implementions" sounds acceptable to me. > I had hoped for a little bit more - four years ago when we postponed this, we were told that work was being done in the area. This feature is a feature that many of HP's users would like, and which HP would be likely to support (in an OWL Full sort of way) if there was an appropriate construct. I note that relational databases have routinely supported a similar functionality for decades. So - please could someone summarize the current state of research on this issue? thanks Jeremy
Received on Monday, 3 December 2007 09:33:08 UTC