Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > In any case, there should probably be some explanation of why the issue > is not being considered, and "no implementions" sounds acceptable to me. > I had hoped for a little bit more - four years ago when we postponed this, we were told that work was being done in the area. This feature is a feature that many of HP's users would like, and which HP would be likely to support (in an OWL Full sort of way) if there was an appropriate construct. I note that relational databases have routinely supported a similar functionality for decades. So - please could someone summarize the current state of research on this issue? thanks JeremyReceived on Monday, 3 December 2007 09:33:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:41 UTC