- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 19:41:32 +0000
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I'm not sure I fully understand this issue, but to the extent that I do understand it I believe that it is already addressed by OWL 1.1's extended capabilities w.r.t. datatypes. If this is the case then I would like to close the issue as being RESOLVED. If not, then can someone explain why not? Thanks, Ian
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2007 19:41:44 UTC