Re: Ontology versions

I formally objected to imports during OWL 1.0, have seen nothing to  
change my mind.  This objection was backed by a couple of other  
people, I cannot now find the record - it was the only formal  
objection from the WG, and the W3C Director chose to let us go to  
recommendation despite this objection, (as I encouraged him to,  
sometimes the chair really has to wear two hats!)
  see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/ 
0281.html




On Dec 21, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Jim Hendler wrote:
>> p.s. Please note, none of this meant to in any way comment on the  
>> imports issue - I never liked the old one anyway.
>
> Please explain why not.
>
> Jeremy
>

"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would  
it?." - Albert Einstein

Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
Tetherless World Constellation Chair
Computer Science Dept
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180