- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:40:38 +0000
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2007 19:40:57 UTC
You're right -- out of scope is not the right reason. I am happy to postpone it on the grounds that we don't know how to do it -- or perhaps more precisely on the grounds that implementors are unwilling and/or unable to support it. Ian On 2 Dec 2007, at 18:20, Jim Hendler wrote: > I'm happy to support closing this as postpoint,but I would have a > problem agreeing that it is out of scope - if we had a working > mechanism we would certainly be allowed to add it. I'd suggest > postponing it because we don't know how to do it. > > > On Dec 1, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote: > >> >> Does anyone want to champion this issue? >> >> If not, then I am inclined to close it as Postponed on the grounds >> of being out of scope. >> >> Ian >> >> > > "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, > would it?." - Albert Einstein > > Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler > Tetherless World Constellation Chair > Computer Science Dept > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180 > > > >
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2007 19:40:57 UTC