> >I see a solution offered by Peter, and one offered by Pat. (I >suggest more intuitive names for the properties). I agree, those names were just off the cuff. >Both suggest additional vocabulary terms. > >Pat, would it be possible to explain the advantage of your solution >over the one Peter suggests? It was intended more to be something acceptable to all parties. But I think it has some advantages. It avoids having an historical debate about the old DAML terminology, it involves fewer terminological changes from OWL, it doesn't extend the user vocabulary much (and where it does, it corresponds to a mental distinction that people are going to have to make in any case, whatever happens) and it is slightly more elegant, if I do say so myself. Pat > >Thanks, > >Alan -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayesReceived on Monday, 17 December 2007 03:32:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:41 UTC