- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:45:59 +0000
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 23:46:13 UTC
Might. My understanding is that not all servers implement providing accurate information about when a resource has changed, and given the perceived value of performance in this area, thought it might be useful to have a mechanism more under user control. However, this should be considered a soft request, and I'm not terribly attached to it. Regards, Alan On Dec 6, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jim Hendler wrote: > Alan - I'm curious, why won't normal document headers used > correctly handle this issue? Why would we need ontology specific > caching? > -JH > > On Dec 6, 2007, at 6:42 AM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> >> >> ISSUE-88 (md5): Ontology header request, optional md5 checksum of >> ontology >> >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ >> >> Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg >> On product: >> >> To allow tools to be able to notice that an ontology on the web >> has not changed after reading just a little of it and instead use >> a local file version (or some preprocessed version of same). >> >> >> > > "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, > would it?." - Albert Einstein > > Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler > Tetherless World Constellation Chair > Computer Science Dept > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180 > > > >
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 23:46:13 UTC