Ian Horrocks wrote: > > On 25 Nov 2007, at 10:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > [snip] > >> ISSUE-32 requests annotation values that are objects as allowed in OWL >> 1.0. Perhaps I don't fully understand the problem, but it appears to me >> that OWL 1.1 already allows annotation values to be OWL entities, which >> provides the same facility as in OWL 1.0. I thus don't see that any >> further extension to annotations is needed to solve this issue. > > This appears to me to be a non-issue, i.e., it asks for something that > is already there. Unless I hear to the contrary I will REJECT and CLOSE it. > > Ian > > I speak to the contrary. Here is an example that is an OWL 1.0 DL and is not in OWL 1.1 DL as currently defined. eg:ap rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . rdfs:label rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . eg:c rdf:type owl:Class . eg:c eg:ap _:x . _:x rdf:type owl:Thing . _:x rdfs:label "No longer allowed." . Hence OWL 1.1 does not provide the same facility as in OWL 1.0, and there is an issue to address. JeremyReceived on Monday, 3 December 2007 09:26:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:41 UTC