- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:16:01 -0500
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 17:16:34 UTC
Alan - I'm curious, why won't normal document headers used correctly handle this issue? Why would we need ontology specific caching? -JH On Dec 6, 2007, at 6:42 AM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > > ISSUE-88 (md5): Ontology header request, optional md5 checksum of > ontology > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ > > Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg > On product: > > To allow tools to be able to notice that an ontology on the web has > not changed after reading just a little of it and instead use a > local file version (or some preprocessed version of same). > > > "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?." - Albert Einstein Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler Tetherless World Constellation Chair Computer Science Dept Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 17:16:34 UTC