- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:12:19 -0500
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <8C2E1496-87AD-4338-9583-937630F31DC5@cs.rpi.edu>
One thing that has come up in the fragments discussion has been the whole issue of provable properties vs. real-world scaling (sometimes called theoretical efficiency vs effectiveness) - question were raised about the theoretical properties of some of the RDFS 3.0 stuff, where I can only say, we're still exploring this, but I note that http://www.bigdata.com/projects/multiproject/bigdata-rdf/index.html reports on the handling of "entailments ...for RDF Schema, owl:sameAs, owl:equivalentProperty, and owl:equivalentClass" at speeds that are pretty amazing (load at 21,000 triples per second, compute at 8100 entailments for second in computing the RDFS+ closure for Wordnet) and in mail on the billion triples mailing list they've proposed that we up the challenge to 10B triples to make things challenging... i realize they are still far less expressive than the RDFS 3.0 proposal (or any of our fragments) and they have no negations and use the realized triples trick to create a finite universe - it's just that 10^9 is a pretty big finite universe, and it's important to realize that RDF DBs are reaching those sizes already - and including some RDFS and OWL constructs, so the Abox stuff is really getting impressive (and hard to ignore) -JH p.s. this is no means meant to endorse bigdata-rdf, a project I know nothing about beyond what is on that web site. "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?." - Albert Einstein Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler Tetherless World Constellation Chair Computer Science Dept Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:12:33 UTC