- From: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:37:32 -0500
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:46 -0500, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > Another quick point to make is that at the meeting there was a clear > use case give for the datatype at the end of a property chain, and > for a comparison to a constant, but not for a comparison of two > values. So until there is competition on the use case side, wouldn't > the bias be to say that we could drop comparisons altogether. On [1] use cases 1,3,6,11,13 are all comparison of two values. Most of the rest are also comparison, but require additional arithmetic. -- Mike Smith Clark & Parsia [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/N-ary_Data_predicate_use_case
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2007 19:37:48 UTC