- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:22:02 -0500
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>, <conrad.bock@nist.gov>, "'Kashyap, Vipul'" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, "'Jeremy Carroll'" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <BFF9AA44-C2A6-44BC-858F-2ABAC352CEFA@cs.rpi.edu>
> My understanding from Jeremy's email in this thread is that in the OWL Full version of 1.1 this can be expressed - if that is the case, why is this postponed rather than accepted, but only for Full (like we do for inverseFunctional Datatypes) On Dec 4, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Ian Horrocks wrote: > > To summarise: This is not allowed in the existing syntax, it would > lead to undecidability if it were allowed (even for very restricted > language subsets), it is not supported by implementations and seems > unlikely to be supported in the foreseeable future. I therefore > propose to postpone it on these grounds. > > Ian > > > On 3 Dec 2007, at 18:59, Uli Sattler wrote: > >> >> Hi Conrad - >> >> On 3 Dec 2007, at 15:38, Conrad Bock wrote: >> >>> >>> Uli, >>> >>>> makes reasoning undecidable (even R o S => T in general, ie, >>>> without >>>> the restrictions imposed by OWL 1.1 because it allows you to >>>> reduce >>>> the intersection problem of contex-free languages to >>>> satisfiability >>>> of concepts) ... >>> >>> Do you know of anyone working on restrictions that would make >>> chains in >>> the "super" position (right hand side) decidable? >>> >> >> I don't know of anybody currently working on it, but we know that >> it (having R o S => T o U) makes reasoning undecidable in the >> logic that >> >> - has only IntersectionOf an SomeValuesFrom restrictions (see >> Baader, DL 2003, http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/ >> Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-81/baader.pdf) >> >> - has only intersectionOf and AllValuesFrom Manfred Schmidt- >> Schau . Subsumption in KL-ONE is undecidable. In Ron J. >> Brachman, Hector J. Levesque, and Ray Reiter, editors, Proc. of >> the 1st Int. >> Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning >> (KR'89), >> pages 421-431. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, 1989. >> >> Cheers, Uli >> >>> Conrad >>> >>>> On 30 Nov 2007, at 14:53, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Would be interested in on the ramifications on the complexity of >>>>> reasoning. >>>>> >>>>> ---Vipul >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org >>>>>> [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Carroll >>>>>> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:53 AM >>>>>> To: OWL Working Group WG >>>>>> Subject: Re: ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 >>>>>> => P2 o P1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ISSUE-83 (Vipul): Property Chain Axiom: P1 o P2 => P2 o P1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Raised by: Vipul Kashyap >>>>>>> On product: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like support for the property chain axiom. >>>>>>> The use case is based on Alan Rector's example in the >>>> DL Handbook >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Skin of the finger is part of the skin of the hand. >>>>>>> covers o part --> part o covers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---Vipul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Interestingly, the constructs we already have, put this >>>> into the OWL >>>>>> Full version of the language ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Jeremy >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The information transmitted in this electronic communication is >>>>> intended only >>>>> for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain >>>>> confidential >>>>> and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, >>>>> dissemination or other >>>>> use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this >>>> information by >>>>> persons or >>>>> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you >>>>> received this >>>>> information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at >>>>> 800-856-1983 and >>>>> properly dispose of this information. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?." - Albert Einstein Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler Tetherless World Constellation Chair Computer Science Dept Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 17:23:54 UTC