- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:25:12 -0500
- To: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Thanks Carsten! Regarding integrating into Bernardo's document - as long as it is Bernardo's version OK. For the version the WG is working on we would need to discuss it at a meeting. If that's what's proposed, could you please submit an issue? Thanks, Alan On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Carsten Lutz wrote: > > Dear all, > > as proposed by Jim, I have set up a Wiki page with details on the EL++ > tractable fragment of OWL 1.1 DL. You can find it at > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/EL > > The version of EL++ given there is, in my opinion, the natural version > of EL++ that comes up as a fragment of OWL 1.1 DL. It differs from the > one given in Bernardo's "tractable fragments" document in a number of > (mostly minor) ways. Notably, > > - some additional expressive power is added, such as reflexive > properties, > facts, and datatypes > > - a nonstructural restriction is adopted to achieve tractability (the > fragment reported in Bernardo's document doesn't have it, and turns > out to be at least PSpace-hard). > >> From my perspective, this settles ISSUE-79 (raised by myself), >> which asks > for the appropriate version of EL++ that we should consider within > this > group. > > As an aside: note that my wiki page is quite long. If EL++ should > become part of the standard, I feel that the document should be even > more detailed. This indicates that standardizing a larger number of > tractable fragments will be quite a bit of work, and produce quite > long documents. > > greetings, > Carsten > > PS: Bernardo, if you want to integrate all or some of this in your > document, please go ahead. > > -- > * Carsten Lutz, Institut f"ur Theoretische Informatik, TU > Dresden * > * Office phone:++49 351 46339171 mailto:lutz@tcs.inf.tu- > dresden.de * >
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 17:31:39 UTC