On Dec 2, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > Isn't this already permitted due to the resolution of issue 64? > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/64 No. That just changes the serialization of exisiting chain axioms. It doesn't introduce new axioms though it does *allow* for new classes of axioms e.g.,: """In OWL 1.1 Full one could use this everywhere, and not just in the rdfs:subPropertyOf.""" Note the "could". > (I added a note to the issue clarifying what the resolution was > and when it was resolved) > > -Alan > > On Dec 2, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: > >> It is possible to extend the spec. to address this? [snip] It's possible to extend the spec. in any number of ways. The question is whether anyone will implement it. Qua implementor, I would strongly prefer that such an extension go under a rule extension such as SWRL. But I'll also say that I don't know how to implement SWRL (or this extension) in a reasonable way. I would suggest lobbying your favorite implementors for such a feature *before* trying to add it to the spec. Adding to the spec doesn't, after all, magically make it available to you. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Monday, 3 December 2007 08:35:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:01 UTC