Re: ISSUE-49 (structural IRIs): REPORTED: structural specification should use IRIs, not strings from Ian Horrocks on 2007-12-01 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from December 2007)

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 19:55:05 +0000
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C4F8D07E-FD49-4E40-9041-240A785C76A8@comlab.ox.ac.uk>

Seems to me that this has been addressed by the use of CURIES  
(ISSUE-14) and the fact that Section 2.2 [1] now says:

The syntax of full and abbreviated IRIs in OWL 1.1 is defined as  
follows.

Full-IRI := '<' IRI as defined in [RFC-3987] '>'
Abbreviated-IRI := curie
URI := Full-IRI | Abbreviated-IRI

Unless I hear to the contrary I will close this issue as RESOLVED.

Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#URIs.2C_Namespaces. 
2C_and_Integers

Received on Saturday, 1 December 2007 19:55:23 UTC