- From: Bernardo Cuenca Grau <bcg@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:07:12 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
> The existing Fragments document provides an overview of various > interesting fragments and pointers into the literature. I don't think > that it would make sense to add a much more detailed description of > any one fragment, at least not until we make strategic decisions on > fragments in general. It may make sense for Bernardo to make > editorial fixes to the existing document in response to the points > made by Carsten below. Yes, I think what makes sense is to make the editorial changes Ian is proposing to the existing document, according to the issues reported by Carsten. I will try to do so asap. Bernardo > > Ian > > > > > > Thanks, > > Alan > > > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Carsten Lutz wrote: > > > >> > >> Dear all, > >> > >> as proposed by Jim, I have set up a Wiki page with details on the > >> EL++ > >> tractable fragment of OWL 1.1 DL. You can find it at > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/EL > >> > >> The version of EL++ given there is, in my opinion, the natural > >> version > >> of EL++ that comes up as a fragment of OWL 1.1 DL. It differs from > >> the > >> one given in Bernardo's "tractable fragments" document in a number of > >> (mostly minor) ways. Notably, > >> > >> - some additional expressive power is added, such as reflexive > >> properties, > >> facts, and datatypes > >> > >> - a nonstructural restriction is adopted to achieve tractability (the > >> fragment reported in Bernardo's document doesn't have it, and turns > >> out to be at least PSpace-hard). > >> > >>> From my perspective, this settles ISSUE-79 (raised by myself), > >>> which asks > >> for the appropriate version of EL++ that we should consider within > >> this > >> group. > >> > >> As an aside: note that my wiki page is quite long. If EL++ should > >> become part of the standard, I feel that the document should be even > >> more detailed. This indicates that standardizing a larger number of > >> tractable fragments will be quite a bit of work, and produce quite > >> long documents. > >> > >> greetings, > >> Carsten > >> > >> PS: Bernardo, if you want to integrate all or some of this in your > >> document, please go ahead. > >> > >> -- > >> * Carsten Lutz, Institut f"ur Theoretische Informatik, TU > >> Dresden * > >> * Office phone:++49 351 46339171 mailto:lutz@tcs.inf.tu- > >> dresden.de * > >> > > > > > > > *********************************** Dr. Bernardo Cuenca Grau Research Fellow Information Management Group School Of Computer Science University of Manchester, UK http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~bcg ************************************
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 18:08:22 UTC