Carsten Lutz wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Jim Hendler wrote: > >> 2 - RDFS 3.0 >> I propose we name a subset called RDFS 3.0 which is less than OWL Lite >> - aimed primarily at universals - i.e. named classes and properties, >> no restriction statements involved. >> There should be a version of this which is provably polynomial within >> certain restrictions (at least no redefinition of the language >> features, possibly > > Then it would IMHO be appropriate if some of the supporters of RDFS > 3.0 would state precisely what this tractable fragment is and prove > that it is tractable. Otherwise, I feel I am discussing a ghost. > I think Jim refers to: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Fragments which posted some times ago. Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Monday, 10 December 2007 10:46:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:41 UTC