dwbp-ACTION-132: Will write an email about what he understandes about the discussion on the uri document and mtcarrasco work to be put on the bp document
dwbp-ACTION-131: Will write about resource version
Granularity and version
Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
extraordinary meeting on monday -1/12/14
agenda for next call 28/11
Half-day call
[2014-11-21] Minutes and an action for you
Apologies for Lewis McGibbney
ACTION-71 Work out goals for data quality vocab by tpac
DWBP document - general information
ISSUE-78
Agenda for fryday
We Need Much More Data
dwbp-ACTION-130: Review issues around ucr and contact individual use case authors to review them in the light of current issues and create relevant actions
Re: Is use of Data Cube Vocabulary for an observation-less catalog considered harmful?
Regrets Re: Agenda for tomorrow
Is use of Data Cube Vocabulary for an observation-less catalog considered harmful?
dwbp-ISSUE-99 (Timeline): Our timelines are hopelessly out of date...
dwbp-ISSUE-98 (R-QualityOpinions): R-QualityOpinions and R-IncorporateFeedback seem to be duplicates? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-97 (Axoims in UCR): Should we include the three axioms in the UCR [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
datacube-validator issues
New Ed Draft of UCR
dwbp-ISSUE-96 (Share-PSI): Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-95 (MSI): Requirements derived from MSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-94 (Git for data): Dataset versioning and dataset replication [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-93 (Open SLAs): Free Open Data SLAs for Open Data publishing [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-92 (Dropping Formats): OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-91 (R-Location): New req: Locations (countries, regions, cities etc.) must be referred to consistently [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-90 (R-UsageFeedback): new req: Data consumers should have a way of sharing feedback and rating data [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-89 (R-SoftwareDataUsage): New req: Data should be annotated with descriptions of software applications using the data [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-88 (R-DesignatedThingsServiceProviders): New req: Data produced by things or services should be associated with complete things/services metadata descriptions. [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-87 (R-DesignatedUserExpertise): New req: Data should be designated if either by virtue of its complexity or its nature is relevant to users with specific expertise. [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-86 (R-DataIrreproducibility): New req: Data should be designated if it is irreproducible [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
dwbp-ISSUE-85 (R-DataLifecycleStage): New Req: Data should be identified by a designated lifecycle stage [Data Usage Vocabulary]
dwbp-ISSUE-84 (Portal resilience): Should DCAT include a pointer to a mirror/back up? [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]
dwbp-ISSUE-83 (LuSTRE): New Reqs from LuSTRE Use Case [Use Cases & Requirements Document]
Canceling Vocabulary calls?
dwbp-ISSUE-82 (Dataset): What is the definition of a dataset? [Best practices document(s)]
dwbp-ACTION-129: Write a use case focusing on versioning (ref issue 69)
dwbp-ACTION-128: Bring out the versioning issues in his use case (ref issue 69)
ISSUE-81: Is the best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html
ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
- Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
- Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
- Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
- Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
- Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
- Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
- Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"