- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 18:37:07 +0100
- To: <Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu>, <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
I agree with Tomas that we need to be careful not to conflate URI and URL. HTTP URIs may share the same syntax space as URLs but their roles are different: URIs identify while URLs locate. I think that design rules for URIs make sense, but design rules for URLs do not. Makx. > -----Original Message----- > From: Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu [mailto:Manuel.CARRASCO- > BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 3:37 PM > To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify > the need for uri and url design > > Dear all, > > One should use the term URI and only use URL when referring to URI > that provides location. > > Quote - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-1.1.3 > > "Uniform Resource Locator" (URL) refers to the subset of URIs that, in > addition to identifying a resource, provide a means of locating the > resource by describing its primary access mechanism > > Future specifications and related documentation should use the general > term "URI" rather than the more restrictive terms "URL" and "URN" > > Regards > Tomas > > -----Original Message----- > From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker > [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 10:26 PM > To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the > need for uri and url design > > dwbp-ACTION-117: Explore the use cases that might clarify the need for > uri and url design > > http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/117 > > Assigned to: Phil Archer > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 17:37:39 UTC