My opinion is that we should not try to redefine what's already
well-defined, unless we have a use case that absolutely needs the wider
definition. If not, let's stick with the DCAT one.
Makx
Op 7 nov. 2014 20:07 schreef "Steven Adler" <adler1@us.ibm.com>:
> Phil,
>
> I wasn't privy to the last definition and am 95% fine with the current
> one. But it does feels a little narrow to me. What about:
>
> A collection of data, published or curated by one or more agents, and
> available for access, use, or download in one or more formats.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve
>
> Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Phil Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03
> AM---I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in]Phil
> Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03 AM---I tried to word the issue relatively
> objectively just now in tracker, allowing for the possibility
>
>
>
> From:
>
>
> Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
>
> To:
>
>
> Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
>
> Date:
>
>
> 11/07/2014 10:10 AM
>
> Subject:
>
>
> Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in tracker,
> allowing for the possibility of the WG to come up with a definition of
> 'dataset' other than that in DCAT. More subjectively, I would personally
> be very opposed to any such redefinition unless there were very strong
> arguments for doing so.
>
> Phil.
>
>
> On 07/11/2014 14:25, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
> Tracker wrote:
> > ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/80
> >
> > Raised by:
> > On product:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>
>
>
