W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:13:36 +0100
Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <082746D4-E5CE-462B-A869-43F5E2B40A5D@eurecom.fr>
To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>

Hi Bernadette, all 

> However, it is not clear for me if the new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*: “Data should have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of the dataset.”  concerns versions of both (datasets and vocabularies). 

I was considering here versioning of datasets in general, having in mind that a vocabulary is a “kind-of” dataset. Although with a different purpose, an ontology can generate dataset as well. 

Hope this clarifies a bit what I was trying to propose.

Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 13:14:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:28 UTC