+0.5 ;) Not sure about the granularity point. I agree with Makx this exists and should be handled but I'm not sure we have to explicitly mention it. This may confuse readers. I'll think more about it... Christophe -- Sent with difficulties. Sorry for the brievety and typos... Op 28 nov. 2014 14:30 schreef "Ghislain Atemezing" < auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>: > On 28/11/2014 14:23, Christophe Guéret wrote: > > That looks fine to me. I would just widen the description to allow for > > versioning any resource, not only datasets. > > What about this one ? (re-using Makx sample) > > *R-VersionURIDesign*: “Publishers should consider having a canonical way > to design URIs for different versions of the resources at differnt > granularity, such as collection of items or individual terms. ” > > Cheers,$ > Ghislain > -- > Ghislain Atemezing > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department > Campus SophiaTech > 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. > e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178 > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin > Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING > Twitter:@gatemezing >
Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 13:37:05 UTC