Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

Hoi,

Do we really need to make the difference between data/metadata and
datasets/vocabularies to speak about versioning ?
IMHO it would be best to just focus on versioning resource identifiers.
Then a requirement on the design of identifiers to ensure they are
version-proof would be sufficient.

Christophe

On 28 November 2014 at 13:00, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
wrote:

> Hello Ghislain,
>
> Thanks for adding one more use case and also for this dicussion about
> versioning!
>
> In my opinion, versioning metadata should be provided both for datasets
> and vocabularies (ontologies). In the same way, it is important to have
> best practices for URI design that helps to deal with these different
> versions.
>
> However, it is not clear for me if the new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*:
> “Data should have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of
> the dataset.”  concerns versions of both (datasets and vocabularies).
>
> Thanks!
> Bernadette
>
> 2014-11-27 11:18 GMT-03:00 Ghislain Atemezing <
> auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>:
>
> Dear Data-web-lovers,
>> [ My 2 cents to solve this issue... ]
>>
>>> ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no
>>> use cases for it
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69
>>>
>> I guess with the second round of UCs [1], we clearly identify that
>> COMSODE's UC falls into versioning issue [2].
>>
>> I've just added a new UC regarding BBC's ontologies, available here [3].
>> I was looking for a requirement dealing with designing URIs and versioning,
>> to (maybe) make use of the COMURI document.
>>
>> I've also proposed a new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*?: “Data should
>> have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of the dataset.”
>>
>> Maybe I didn't check enough the document to find overlaps with existing
>> requirements. If so, please thanks for pointing the right requirement.
>>
>> I hope these UCs will motivate the presence of including versioning in
>> the bp document.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ghislain
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases
>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#
>> Dataset_versioning_and_dataset_replication
>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#
>> BBC_ontology_versioning_and_Metadata
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ghislain Atemezing
>> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
>> Campus SophiaTech
>> 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
>> e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
>> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
>> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
>> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
>> Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
>> Twitter:@gatemezing
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>