W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:18:14 +0100
Message-ID: <547732A6.7000206@eurecom.fr>
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Dear Data-web-lovers,
[ My 2 cents to solve this issue... ]
> ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69
I guess with the second round of UCs [1], we clearly identify that 
COMSODE's UC falls into versioning issue [2].

I've just added a new UC regarding BBC's ontologies, available here [3]. 
I was looking for a requirement dealing with designing URIs and 
versioning, to (maybe) make use of the COMURI document.

I've also proposed a new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*?: “Data should 
have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of the dataset.”

Maybe I didn't check enough the document to find overlaps with existing 
requirements. If so, please thanks for pointing the right requirement.

I hope these UCs will motivate the presence of including versioning in 
the bp document.


[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases

Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2014 14:18:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:28 UTC