RE: New Ed Draft of UCR

That's great Phil thanks! I'm travelling at the moment,but will be back on Thursday. I will have a look over doc and see where I can help in terms of resolved issues from TPAC and new use-cases.


Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee

From: Phil Archer []
Sent: 10 November 2014 20:49
To: Public DWBP WG; Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J); Annette Greiner; Eric Stephan
Subject: New Ed Draft of UCR

Dear all,

As the flurry of new issues in your inbox shows, I've been working on
the UCR doc today, see

Changes made:

- The Reqs that we resolved to remove have been removed.

- The new use cases in the wiki have been added (except those proposed
by Fraunhofer, see ISSUE-93 and ISSUE-94).

- I have added some new requirements in based on my assessment of the
new new cases. For each new proposed requirement I opened an issue. see

Lewis, Annette, Eric - please take a look at what I've done to your use
cases. In Annette's case I think we need to talk through what the
possible reqs will be - I suspect there will be a lot of commonality
with the RDESC one and we'll have some new reqs out of it.

The R-Location requirement is one I added based on my own new use case
(and I think it's useful in Lewis's too). But see Issue-96 as this use
case is a little different - I'd like to essentially refer to the report
of a workshop as the use case.

There are other minor changes but those are the main ones.

Not done yet - there's a good deal of housekeeping to do yet but I hope
this counts as progress.



Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
+44 (0)7887 767755

Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 08:32:45 UTC