- From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:22:17 +0100
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- CC: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABP9CAHKXtU295NoVL-4SLO3gd-Dbb4BdP=jK_hXWwmQst7X8g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bernadette, Thanks for putting back all that in one mail, very useful :-) I would like to port the content from the previous preservation page into the new one and I'm not sure how to best relate that with the template (by the way, [6] is broken but I guess it is the same as http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bptemplate.html ). Shall we just use the same wording as on the template ? or is there maybe some markup to use to facilitate the conversion later ? Cheers, Christophe On 19 November 2014 15:06, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: > Hi all, > > During the F2F at Santa Clara, we had a lot of discussions about the scope > [1] and the organization of the best practices document, and some important > decisions were made [2], including: > > - All of our best practices will be in one document, because it is easier > for readers/implementers to understand and easier for editors/contributors > to manage. > > - Each best practice will be defined according to a specific structure. > During TPAC, Phil proposed a template structure [6]. > > - Our scoping criteria [1], i.e., requirements and best practices should > be defined considering the following criteria : > - Is it unique to publishing data on the Web? > - Does it encourage reuse or publication of data on the Web? > - Is it testable? In what way? > > It is really important to keep these information in mind during best > practices definition. > > We also had an agreement abou the organization of the best practices > document [3] and some contributors were defined [4]. > > Finally, in order to facilitate the edition of the document, new wiki > pages were created for each one of the proposed sections [4]. In general, > each section should have a general description about the theme (ex: Data > vocabularies, Data formats...), followed by one or more best practices. It > is also important to give examples to illustrate the best practices. > Documents that were previously created should be adapted in order to be > included in the BP document. > > Contributors are free to use the new wiki pages or to directly edit the > draft available on github [5]. We kindly ask you to send an email to the > group or to the editors when a new update is made. > > kind regards, > Bernadette, Caroline and Newton > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Scope > [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/10/31-dwbp-minutes.html > [3] > http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Table_of_Contents_of_Data_on_the_Web_Best_Practices > [4] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Best_Practices > [5] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html > [6] http://philarcher.org/dwbp/bptemplate.html > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Onderzoeker +31(0)6 14576494 christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)* DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO. Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres: DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> | www.dans.knaw.nl *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!* http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/ *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)* [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 14:23:06 UTC