Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

+1 to Bernadette too.

In fact, we can argue that a resource can be anything from a thing
(dataset, data point, city, ...), to an HTML representation of the
description of a thing to a CSV serialisation of a dataset.
It is merely an identifier for something that can be described in a
structured way. The issue is that the description can change over time
whereas the identifier itself should remain stable but we can probably fix
that with giving specific time-based identifiers to resources and relate
them with the time independent identifier of the resources.

Christophe


On 28 November 2014 at 13:40, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com> wrote:

> Bernadette,
>
>
>
> Good point. In fact, an ontology is a type of dataset.
>
>
>
> Makx.
>
>
>
> *From:* Bernadette Farias Lóscio [mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 28, 2014 1:24 PM
> *To:* Christophe Guéret
> *Cc:* Ghislain Atemezing; public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc?
> currently there are no use cases for it
>
>
>
> Hello Christophe,
>
>
>
> I think it's gonna be easier if we don't make this difference. Then, in
> this case, we need to make clear that a resource may denote a dataset or a
> vocabulary. Do you agree?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bernadette
>
>
>
> 2014-11-28 9:11 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <
> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>:
>
> Hoi,
>
> Do we really need to make the difference between data/metadata and
> datasets/vocabularies to speak about versioning ?
>
> IMHO it would be best to just focus on versioning resource identifiers.
> Then a requirement on the design of identifiers to ensure they are
> version-proof would be sufficient.
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
> On 28 November 2014 at 13:00, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Ghislain,
>
>
>
> Thanks for adding one more use case and also for this dicussion about
> versioning!
>
>
>
> In my opinion, versioning metadata should be provided both for datasets
> and vocabularies (ontologies). In the same way, it is important to have
> best practices for URI design that helps to deal with these different
> versions.
>
>
>
> However, it is not clear for me if the new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*:
> “Data should have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of
> the dataset.”  concerns versions of both (datasets and vocabularies).
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bernadette
>
>
>
> 2014-11-27 11:18 GMT-03:00 Ghislain Atemezing <
> auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>:
>
>
>
> Dear Data-web-lovers,
> [ My 2 cents to solve this issue... ]
>
> ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no
> use cases for it
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69
>
> I guess with the second round of UCs [1], we clearly identify that
> COMSODE's UC falls into versioning issue [2].
>
> I've just added a new UC regarding BBC's ontologies, available here [3]. I
> was looking for a requirement dealing with designing URIs and versioning,
> to (maybe) make use of the COMURI document.
>
> I've also proposed a new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*?: “Data should
> have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of the dataset.”
>
> Maybe I didn't check enough the document to find overlaps with existing
> requirements. If so, please thanks for pointing the right requirement.
>
> I hope these UCs will motivate the presence of including versioning in the
> bp document.
>
> Best,
> Ghislain
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases
> [2]
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#Dataset_versioning_and_dataset_replication
> [3]
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#BBC_ontology_versioning_and_Metadata
>
>
> --
> Ghislain Atemezing
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> Campus SophiaTech
> 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
> e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
> Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
> Twitter:@gatemezing
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> --
>
> Onderzoeker
> +31(0)6 14576494
> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
>
>
>
> *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*
>
> DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
> www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
> NWO.
>
>
>
> Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:
>
> DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
> Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
> www.dans.knaw.nl
>
>
>
> *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
> http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
>
>
> *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
>
>
>
> <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
>
> -- <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
>
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
>



-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>