- From: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:52:01 +0100
- To: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF230997FA.E3D43C9C-ONC1257D94.006792C2-C1257D94.0067A404@netage.nl>
Yaso <yaso@nic.br> wrote on 18-11-2014 19:48:04: > Hi all > > I think we can address the ISSUE-94. > > Hosting datasets on a Git repository can be one (good) way to provide > provenance to track data but this is also true to wiki pages, for > example. (it's not usual, but can be done in specific cases) > > I propose that we agree that the working group can not recommend any > tool, althought this do not excludes using the use cases that were > raised at the discussions to raise requirements. +1 > Anyone has any comment? > > yaso > > > > > > > On 11/13/14 11:49 AM, Augusto Herrmann wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Another good example of using git for data is the directory of public > > bodies of governments all over the world that OKFn has been curating [1][2]. > > > > I agree with Annette's argument that tools on this field are rapidly > > evolving, and the WG should probably not recommend a particular tool as a > > BP at this pint. > > > > Also relevant to this discussion is Max Ogden's `dat` tool, which intends > > to be a 'git for data' [3][4]. Looks promising. > > > > [1] http://publicbodies.org/ > > [2] https://github.com/okfn/publicbodies > > [3] http://www.wired.com/2014/08/dat/ > > [4] https://github.com/maxogden/dat > > > > Best regards, > > Augusto Herrmann > > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Yaso <yaso@nic.br> wrote: > > > >> > >> Em 11/11/14, 7:29 PM, Annette Greiner escreveu: > >>> we need to draw a line between data mangement practices and data > >> publishing practices. > >> > >> Agree! > >> > >> But it's a thin line. We can achieve this (possible) best practices > >> either with a vocab or with a versioning document system (Git, HG even a > >> wiki with yaml). I'm wondering if these items are not data management > >> practices AND publishing practices... > >> > >> track changes in data > >> provide possibility to review the history of changes > >> provide audit trail > >> get access to whichever previous version of data, not only to most > >> recent version > >> > >> Agree about the "get dataset updates more efficiently" being a > >> management practice only. for now, at least :-) > >> > >> yaso > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br > >> W3C Brazil Office > >> @yaso - yaso.eu > >> > >> 55 11 5509-3537 (4025) > >> skype: yasocordova > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br > W3C Brazil Office > @yaso - yaso.eu > > 55 11 5509-3537 (4025) > skype: yasocordova >
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 18:52:37 UTC