- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:57:10 -0200
- To: "Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J)" <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CANx1Pzy3fUFxH0X5H3zU36pECdFehZtx5ABYPTsscNMR=mTn1w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Phil, Thank you very much for the updating! As a next step, for each new requirement, I think we should discuss: - the requirement is in our scope ? - the requirement can be associated to one of the existing challenges or a new challenge should be created ? cheers, Bernadette 2014-11-11 6:32 GMT-02:00 Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>: > That's great Phil thanks! I'm travelling at the moment,but will be back on > Thursday. I will have a look over doc and see where I can help in terms of > resolved issues from TPAC and new use-cases. > > Cheers, > Deirdre > > Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group > Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland > Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > > ________________________________________ > From: Phil Archer [phila@w3.org] > Sent: 10 November 2014 20:49 > To: Public DWBP WG; Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398J); Annette Greiner; Eric > Stephan > Subject: New Ed Draft of UCR > > Dear all, > > As the flurry of new issues in your inbox shows, I've been working on > the UCR doc today, see > > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html. > > Changes made: > > - The Reqs that we resolved to remove have been removed. > > - The new use cases in the wiki have been added (except those proposed > by Fraunhofer, see ISSUE-93 and ISSUE-94). > > - I have added some new requirements in based on my assessment of the > new new cases. For each new proposed requirement I opened an issue. see > ISSUE-83, ISSUE-85, ISSUE-86, ISSUE-87, ISSUE-88, ISSUE-89, ISSUE-91. > > Lewis, Annette, Eric - please take a look at what I've done to your use > cases. In Annette's case I think we need to talk through what the > possible reqs will be - I suspect there will be a lot of commonality > with the RDESC one and we'll have some new reqs out of it. > > The R-Location requirement is one I added based on my own new use case > (and I think it's useful in Lewis's too). But see Issue-96 as this use > case is a little different - I'd like to essentially refer to the report > of a workshop as the use case. > > There are other minor changes but those are the main ones. > > Not done yet - there's a good deal of housekeeping to do yet but I hope > this counts as progress. > > Phil. > > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > > > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 12:57:57 UTC