- From: Adriano C. Machado Pereira <adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br>
- Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 13:10:59 -0200
- To: Ig Ibert Bittencourt <ig.ibert@gmail.com>
- Cc: Yaso <yaso@nic.br>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMDPrXaO25HieECzmjDuRih6z6MJ9F6wTqn7=mXpNeB_Po8WKQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to Makx Regards! -- Adriano C. Machado Pereira. On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Ig Ibert Bittencourt <ig.ibert@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to Makx > On Nov 7, 2014 9:49 PM, "Yaso" <yaso@nic.br> wrote: > >> +1 to Makx >> >> >> Em 11/7/14, 12:09 PM, Makx Dekkers escreveu: >> > My opinion is that we should not try to redefine what's already >> > well-defined, unless we have a use case that absolutely needs the wider >> > definition. If not, let's stick with the DCAT one. >> > >> > Makx >> > Op 7 nov. 2014 20:07 schreef "Steven Adler" <adler1@us.ibm.com>: >> > >> >> Phil, >> >> >> >> I wasn't privy to the last definition and am 95% fine with the current >> >> one. But it does feels a little narrow to me. What about: >> >> >> >> A collection of data, published or curated by one or more agents, and >> >> available for access, use, or download in one or more formats. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again" >> >> >> >> [image: Inactive hide details for Phil Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03 >> >> AM---I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in]Phil >> >> Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03 AM---I tried to word the issue relatively >> >> objectively just now in tracker, allowing for the possibility >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: >> >> >> >> >> >> Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> >> >> >> >> To: >> >> >> >> >> >> Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org> >> >> >> >> Date: >> >> >> >> >> >> 11/07/2014 10:10 AM >> >> >> >> Subject: >> >> >> >> >> >> Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in tracker, >> >> allowing for the possibility of the WG to come up with a definition of >> >> 'dataset' other than that in DCAT. More subjectively, I would >> personally >> >> be very opposed to any such redefinition unless there were very strong >> >> arguments for doing so. >> >> >> >> Phil. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 07/11/2014 14:25, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue >> >> Tracker wrote: >> >>> ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset" >> >>> >> >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/80 >> >>> >> >>> Raised by: >> >>> On product: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> Phil Archer >> >> W3C Data Activity Lead >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >> >> >> >> http://philarcher.org >> >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> >> @philarcher1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- >> Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br >> W3C Brazil Office >> @yaso - yaso.eu >> >> 55 11 5509-3537 (4025) >> skype: yasocordova >> >>
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 23:58:21 UTC