Dublin minutes Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 September)
https URI scheme Julian Reschke (Sunday, 10 August)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 30 July)
- Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke (Friday, 1 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke (Friday, 1 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Frank Ellermann (Friday, 1 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 2 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Frank Ellermann (Saturday, 2 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 2 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Frank Ellermann (Sunday, 3 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke (Sunday, 3 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Frank Ellermann (Sunday, 3 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 3 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Julian Reschke (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: Issue 113 Frank Ellermann (Monday, 4 August)
- qvalue *, was: Issue 113 Julian Reschke (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue *, was: Issue 113 Frank Ellermann (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue *, was: Issue 113 Julian Reschke (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue *, was: Issue 113 Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: Issue 113 Yves Lafon (Monday, 4 August)
- qvalue *, was: Re: Issue 113 Frank Ellermann (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue *, was: Re: Issue 113 Julian Reschke (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Frank Ellermann (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Julian Reschke (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * ryah dahl (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Adrien de Croy (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Frank Ellermann (Monday, 4 August)
- RE: qvalue * Robert Brewer (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Frank Ellermann (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 4 August)
- RE: qvalue * Robert Brewer (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * William A. Rowe, Jr. (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Frank Ellermann (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: qvalue * Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 5 August)
- Re: qvalue * Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 5 August)
- Re: qvalue *, was: Re: Issue 113 Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: Issue 113 Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 4 August)
- Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 4 August)
Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags) Felix Sasaki (Saturday, 2 August)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Mark Baker (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Mark Baker (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Mark Baker (Tuesday, 29 July)
- RE: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Brian Smith (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Mark Baker (Tuesday, 29 July)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Julian Reschke (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Brian Smith (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
Re: i107 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 28 July)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Monday, 28 July)
- Re: i107 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 28 July)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Monday, 28 July)
- RE: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Thursday, 31 July)
- RE: i107 Yves Lafon (Friday, 1 August)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Friday, 1 August)
- RE: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 1 August)
Re: i107 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 28 July)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Monday, 28 July)
- Re: i107 Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 29 July)
- RE: i107 Brian Smith (Tuesday, 29 July)
- RE: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
Re: i107 Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 31 July)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Frank Ellermann (Monday, 28 July)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 5 August)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Friday, 29 August)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Julian Reschke (Sunday, 31 August)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Sunday, 31 August)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Julian Reschke (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Jamie Lokier (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Yves Lafon (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Jamie Lokier (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Jamie Lokier (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Yves Lafon (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Monday, 1 September)
- RE: issue 85 - range unit extensions Robert Brewer (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Tuesday, 2 September)
- RE: issue 85 - range unit extensions Robert Brewer (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Tuesday, 2 September)
Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions Kris Zyp (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Frank Ellermann (Sunday, 20 July)
- Re: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 21 July)
- Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 14 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Julian Reschke (Friday, 15 August)
- RE: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Brian Smith (Friday, 15 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Julian Reschke (Friday, 15 August)
- RE: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Brian Smith (Friday, 15 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 15 August)
- RE: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Brian Smith (Sunday, 17 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Julian Reschke (Sunday, 17 August)
- RE: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Brian Smith (Monday, 18 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Julian Reschke (Monday, 18 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Frank Ellermann (Saturday, 16 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 19 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123) William A. Rowe, Jr. (Tuesday, 19 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123) Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 19 August)
- RE: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123) Brian Smith (Tuesday, 19 August)
- Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 20 August)
- OT: historical file systems (was: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123)) Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 19 August)
Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Julian Reschke (Saturday, 16 August)
Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123), was: Content-Disposition (new issue?) Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 15 August)
Re: Factoring out Content-Disposition (i123) Frank Ellermann (Saturday, 16 August)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Charles Fry (Friday, 18 July)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Julian Reschke (Saturday, 19 July)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Charles Fry (Monday, 21 July)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 22 July)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Charles Fry (Thursday, 28 August)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Julian Reschke (Friday, 29 August)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Julian Reschke (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Monday, 15 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Julian Reschke (Monday, 15 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Monday, 15 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Brian McBarron (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Brian McBarron (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Charles Fry (Friday, 19 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Julian Reschke (Friday, 19 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Jamie Lokier (Friday, 19 September)
- Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 19 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Charles Fry (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Charles Fry (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 16 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions William A. Rowe, Jr. (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions William A. Rowe, Jr. (Wednesday, 17 September)
- Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Charles Fry (Wednesday, 17 September)
Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions Brian McBarron (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 14 July)
- Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 15 July)
- Re: Issue 72, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79 Julian Reschke (Friday, 18 July)
CONNECT Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Robert Collins (Wednesday, 2 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 2 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Frank Ellermann (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Dave Singer (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Dave Singer (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 3 July)
- Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Frank Ellermann (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Frank Ellermann (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Boris Zbarsky (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Saturday, 5 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Sam Ruby (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea David Morris (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Ian Hickson (Monday, 7 July)
- any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] Dan Connolly (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] T.V Raman (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Justin James (Monday, 7 July)
- URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Monday, 7 July)
- Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Martin Duerst (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Robert J Burns (Tuesday, 8 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Justin James (Monday, 7 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 7 July)
- the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 8 July)
- RE: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Justin James (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Geoffrey Sneddon (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Julian Reschke (Sunday, 6 July)
- RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea Chris Wilson (Tuesday, 8 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 3 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 3 July)
RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Thursday, 3 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Daniel Stenberg (Thursday, 3 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 3 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Karl Dubost (Friday, 4 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 4 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Adam Barth (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Karl Dubost (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Adam Barth (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Adam Barth (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Julian Reschke (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Dave Singer (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 4 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Michael A. Puls II (Friday, 4 July)
- RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Eric Lawrence (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Alfonso MartÃnez de Lizarrondo (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Frank Ellermann (Sunday, 6 July)
- Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Stefan Eissing (Monday, 7 July)
RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Justin James (Friday, 4 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 3 July)
RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Sam Ruby (Thursday, 3 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 3 July)
Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter Frank Ellermann (Wednesday, 2 July)
Last message date: Monday, 29 September 2008 16:44:17 UTC