- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:15:24 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Felix Sasaki wrote: > ... > RFC 4647 defines a basic language range in sec. 2.1 which is the same as > the language range of sec. 14.4 of RFC 2616. Note also the information > in sec. 2.1 of RFC 4647: > "Note that > the ABNF [RFC4234] in [RFC2616] is incorrect, since it disallows the > use of digits anywhere in the 'language-range' (see [RFC2616errata])." > So you could just refer to basic language ranges of RFC 4647 and be fine. > ... Indeed, thanks for pointing this out. I missed the fact that RFC 4647 defines basic ranges. Will make a concrete proposal later on. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 12:35:30 UTC