RE: i28 proposed replacement text

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Section 4.4:
> OLD:
> 
>     2.  If a Transfer-Encoding header field (Section 8.7) is present,
>         then the transfer-length is defined by use of the "chunked"
>         transfer-coding (Section 3.4), unless the message is
terminated
>         by closing the connection.
> 
> NEW:
> 
>     2.  If a Transfer-Encoding header field (Section 8.7) and the
>         "chunked" transfer-coding (Section 3.4) is used, the transfer-
>         length is defined by the use of that this transfer-coding.  If
>         the "chunked" transfer-coding is not present, the transfer-
> length
>         is defined by the sender closing the connection.

"...that this transfer-coding" needs a grammar tweak.


Robert Brewer
fumanchu@aminus.org

Received on Saturday, 5 July 2008 16:13:34 UTC