Re: Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

• From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
• Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:19:08 +0200
• To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <g74b68$4vt$1@ger.gmane.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:

>>> A more useful example using * is
>>>  Accept-Language: da, en-gb;q=0.8, en;q=0.7, *;q=0.001

>> Then let's add it to the spec., with an explanation:
>> "Typically '*' is used with the lowest <qvalue>" 
 
> Is that better than not specifying value for "*" at all?

Dunno.  Clearly this question needs the *same* answer for
all "*" cum <qvalue> contructs in various Accept-* header
fields.  That might be a new issue (not limited to #113).

 Frank

Received on Sunday, 3 August 2008 13:18:47 UTC