- From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:25:35 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: Brian McBarron <bpm@google.com>, gears-eng@googlegroups.com, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Charles Fry <fry@google.com>, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > >But I agree that you might be able to use existing URL-based front-end > >load-balancing kit, and that might reduce the cost of implementation > >substantially. > > Is there a hidden assumption there that this is done in hardware? No. By "kit" I mean readily available hardware and/or software, which does URL-based affinity HTTP request forwarding for load balancing. -- Jamie
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 11:26:58 UTC