Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions

Mark Nottingham wrote:
 
> see <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc301869.aspx>.

Apparently a broken link, I found:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms948096.aspx>

| Content-Length: 677
| Content-Range: rows=1-2; total=2

That is rather different from your proposal, I can't judge
the relevance of these apparently incompatible extensions.

 Frank