- From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:24:55 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > >5. What does "might be individually accessed" mean? As far as cache > >validation is concerned (which is the only time Content-Location is used in > >the protocol itself), the Content-Location doesn't have to be accessible. > >That whole condition can be removed since it is meaningless. > > What's the point in supplying a Content-Location, if nobody can access it? Could it be like XML namespace URIs - to provide a unique identifier that is not necessarily meant to be an accessible resource? -- Jamie
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 12:25:31 UTC